(In trying to help
us understand the awareness of beings with long
lifespans, Treebeard uses some of the oldest trees
on Earth to compare to young devas and their time
perception. He reminds us that in the end we are
all just the stuff of stars.)
Treebeard:
let us move along to our
continuing discussion on what is
aware and what not is not aware.
Russ: oh excellent, thank you.
Treebeard: as we were discussing
last time, certain species of
fauna on your planet is aware but
on different levels of your
understanding. For example, I see
little feets with pointed ears and
tails that are aware but with
juvenile delight and playfulness
of being in activity and
expenditure of energy with purpose
for learning necessary skills that
aren't necessary but aid in
survival when necessary being
acted out. For example, the flight
down the steps being for a hunting
trip.
Russ: oh yes.
Treebeard: the pursuing and biting
and rolling and playing is
learning the necessary physical
tactile controls for these little
beings. Like all of your aware
species, it is part of their
becoming aware that they act out
these processes for their
development. Now, moving back into
fauna, there are certain species
of faunas that act out their
survivals and need certain power
fluctuations for their
advancement. You have power
fluctuations then?
Russ: uh-hmm...just a little
glitch.
Treebeard: ah, so being of a
infinitely longer period of
awareness, then the playful beings
that you have present is a
different process of instinctual
behaviors and patterns. The
patterns of great wisdom and age
in a fauna being is something that
is a different awareness level.
The greater age species of fauna
such as your great trees is that
your movements and activities
happen quickly and therefore are
of no worry or concern and if
actions transpire to take away
their awareness, then that is part
of the growth for them. You have a
question being of how does that
fit into the spiritual growth? You
would say that they are being the
early growth of a different form
of awareness. If you do the
analyzing and thought processes of
what kind of awareness would being
of a long perception, you would
come up with a possible answer
that I am unable to confirm or
deny but, let us pursue that
avenue for understanding to
facilitate your own growth.
Russ: okay.
Treebeard: so I put a question to
you.
Russ: all right.
Treebeard: what species or being
or entity would be the younger
version of what they are now which
is being a species that has a long
perception of time being a moment
to you may being of a infinite
length of time or an infinite
length of time for you being but a
moment of passing for them?
Russ: and this would be in fauna I
assume?
Treebeard: that is.....
Russ: I mean flora sorry.
Treebeard: fauna.
Russ: oh fauna..
Treebeard: flora and fauna.
Russ: okay, umm I would say
probably some of the oldest trees
as we're discussing before, the
bristle cone pine......
Treebeard; uh-hmm.
Russ: of which to them our mere 80
years on earth is just eight rings
on a tree for them.
Treebeard: uh-hmm.
Russ: and they would see it as
very short and yet for us it's a
very long time but in their scale
they would be more comparable to
Sirians or someone with a very
long lifespan to us.
Treebeard: yes but that is not
where I am trying to pursue.
Russ: oh.
Treebeard: what I'm trying to say
is that you would say that you are
the children of, in your youth you
are children, in your maturity you
are eighth and ninth dimensional
beings and in your age you would
being of higher. So what would the
bristle cone being be?
Russ: it would be probably……a
probably like third dimensional?
Treebeard: hmmm, let us look at
this in a different light or from
a different avenue. They would be
young blanks, again using one of
your thought processes and
phrases.
Russ: sprouts?
Treebeard: ummmm, no. A bristle
cone tree would be of without
giving too much away on thought
processes, a young antlered one.
Russ: a young buck.
Treebeard: hmmmm.....clear your
minds, mind. You have just a few
weeks ago walked the circle have
you not?
Russ: uh-hmm. Oh I see...
Treebeard: so a bristle cone with
being a young.......
Russ: deva.
Treebeard: yes, possibly. As I
stated, it is something I can
neither confirm nor denies.
Russ: I see what you're talking
about. Hmm, that would be hinting
at a much greater awareness
perhaps.
Treebeard: what is transpiring?
Russ: oh, our older cat is rather
upset about the younger
playfulness of our smaller
brethren.
Treebeard: I suggest you do not, I
suggest you grin and bear as it is
necessary for learning of respect.
Russ: okay, it will certainly
learn some respect if it comes
down to that.
Treebeard: I think that juvenile
mother would being present would
watch out for young offspring to
serve lesson in learning.
Russ: well it's going to be
teaching respect for Ganja here
who currently runs the house as
far as cats go.
Treebeard: yes, okay let us
continue and answer questions on
being.
Russ: all right, now devas
themselves of who as we mentioned
have but a mere moment to them is
centuries to us.
Treebeard: or vice a versa.
Russ: vice a versa, right. Do they
have any kind of set schedule, or
not schedule....
Treebeard: pattern?
Russ: no, not so much
pattern.....agenda?
Treebeard: yes, I would assume so,
I really do not know as to them I
am a mere child. To see a pattern
I would have to dwell for many
days, many weeks, maybe many
months to see a pattern and
analyze in my non-dormant time,
that is all I would dwell upon, do
you wish to do this?
Russ: no, I do not wish to do
that. I would just like to just
kind of explore maybe just the
outer fringes of that question.
Treebeard: (chuckles) okay.
Russ: for example, if I look at
the history of devas and the
etheric beings of our limited
knowledge here on our planet and
the stories that we've gone
through, you would see from what
we've had that they are more in
tune with the growth of plants,
rocks if they grow or stay the way
they are, nature. Nature, they are
very much in tune and in control
of nature itself. But being as
they are etheric beings and the
substance of nature is just made
up of molecules and basically they
are merely manipulating the
molecules.......
Treebeard: uh-huh.
Russ: but they themselves aren't
made of molecules are they?
Treebeard: they take on forms that
they so desire in appearance. When
seen as a form, they have
molecules and beings. They are
being of molecules all the time
but more densely packed when you
perceive them.
Russ: I see, so it's almost a
loose collection of molecules that
make up the deva and then they
bring those together as they so
desire.
Treebeard: it would be better to
say it is a loose committee of
molecules that debate when they
are more densely confined in a
compacted area.
Russ: I see. So it could almost be
called a group consciousness of
molecules?
Treebeard: you could also be
called that, I could also being
called that.
Russ: now that's an interesting
thought. A group
consciousness....well what makes
up our mind and our brain, our
toe, our knee, our finger?
Treebeard: all molecules of you
are you from wherever. If you hold
up your big digit, thank you, have
a look at it. Say hello to a piece
of Deneba.
Russ: hello a piece of Deneba.
Treebeard: look at another digit
and say, hello piece of Sirius.
Russ: I see where this is going,
we're made up of the same
substance as the stars.
Treebeard: you, myself the.....
Russ: feline who wants out.
Treebeard: are being made up out
of, as you would say, the stuff of
stars.
Russ: uh-huh.
Treebeard: and I think he is being
fed up with being pestered, it is
an assumption I am trying to make.
Russ: I would assume you are
fairly correct in that.
Treebeard: pick up one of the
juveniles and say hello to a piece
of a Betelgeuse star.
Russ: hi Betelgeuse.
Treebeard: so you are seeing where
the progression goes.
Russ: right, okay. So the
conscious thought that makes up
myself and you and one of the
little ones there and a deva are
all the same thing. So the
question I guess comes down to a
point is, why do all those
molecules get together to say,
"well I think we're going to be
this person or this deva or this
Sirian, or....."?
Treebeard: or that Sirian or
this......
Russ: kitten.
Treebeard: kitten.
Russ: correct, right.
Treebeard: the answer would be one
that we can speculate on without
taking from your learning path.
Russ: okay.
Treebeard: it is difficult for me
to give you a answer that would be
easy to comprehend in your
language even though it is fluid,
is lacking in eloquency on
meanings of word.
Russ: okay, so theoretically I
should come up with the correct
answer or an answer that best fits
the question and give you that?
Treebeard: I think that would be
self-evident would it not?
Russ: well it takes me a while to
jump to these self-evident
conclusions as opposed to the ones
that aren't so self-evident.
Treebeard: well it is easier for
you to come up with answers when
given a gentle nudge from two
directions.
Russ: true.
|