(Omal gives a dissertation on the spiritual consciousness of everything. The key is finding a balanced harmony within yourself and then passing that on to others. He stresses not doing so in a pushy way but only if someone expresses an interest in whatever belief system is being discussed.) 

---

Omal: greetings Russ.

Russ: greetings.

Omal: greetings Skip.

Skip: greetings.

Russ: greetings Omal.

Omal: okay, everything looks good on Kiri’s end apart from her vibrational frequency. Okay, what are we here to discuss tonight?

Skip: I’m just trying to remember what we were discussing.

Russ: we didn't have anything set to discuss.

Omal: we did not. I am a little bit on a tight schedule this evening, I have approximately 15 to 20 minutes.

Skip: okay.

Russ: okay.

Omal: okay, let us set up a brief dissertation for the Internet concerning, as we are on a spiritual vein tonight, spiritual consciousness of everything. Everything being a general term of the belief in the universal goodwill of all things and the spiritual development of individuals to a higher plane of consciousness whether it is a third dimensional, sixth dimensional, seventh dimensional level of consciousness, the goals are all the same and that is to achieve a harmony within oneself that you are balanced. Being balanced is a way to achieve a peaceful persona and aura around you which attracts likewise. However, if you are too vocal on your spirituality, that can be a negative factor if you behave too passionately and believe that others are wrong and should believe your beliefs. It is more important to accept individuals for their spiritual beliefs or non-beliefs as well as your own. By forcing your beliefs on somebody else, that could be classified as a sin using a third dimensional term. A sin in the sense that you would be forcing against somebody’s will your belief and trying to convert them to your belief. If they are not ready to be converted to your belief, then don’t force them but if you explain to them your religious point of view or your spirituality and let them choose for themselves, then a respect is created whether or not they choose because it is their choice. You are not forcing them and you are not telling them that their way is wrong, you’re explaining your beliefs and the beliefs that you have and it does not matter what their beliefs are because that is their beliefs. But to sit there and try to dominate and preach as some of your third dimensional preachers do that if you do not believe my religion then you are doomed, you will go to a hot and infernal pain for all time and never see an opportunity to be reborn again, that is wrong. What is right is to say this is what I believe and I do not fault you for what you believe, that is your choice, that is what makes you who you are. If you feel like talking about my religion, I will be delighted to but I will not force it upon you, end of subject. But, if they continue to question you about your religion, it means that they are interested so you tell them the truth, you tell them what you believe but you do not say to them, "you should take it up too". How do you know what they should take up, how do you know what they will enjoy, how do you know what they will like? You do not honestly know what somebody else will like and enjoy. You can assume, you can analyze and come up with a reasonable assumption of what they will believe, what they will like but you should never force them, force your belief on somebody else. Okay, my dissertation is up.

Russ: uh-huh.

Omal: okay, let's answer questions.

Russ: okay, with anybody’s religion, we're kind of at a point where they have a deep belief in something and you have a deep belief in something......

Omal: uh-huh.

Russ: and in not discussing religion, then you kind of pretty much stay on even ground but what I see is the problem is when people start to discuss religion is, even if they say, "this is what I believe in" and "this is what I believe in", then the two beliefs tend to get to a point where they get to a middle ground where you start to understand what the other person believes and they do see that common ground that is there. So I think if more people were able to discuss religion and get a kind of, where is the truth, what’s in between the lines?

Omal: well you need to create a feeling of unimportance on converting. It is quite common for people to become very passionate about their religious beliefs almost to the point of trying to dominate somebody and convert them to their belief. I've seen it so many times and it is a small minority that takes the stance of, "it is unimportant, you're free to believe what you wish to believe. If you wish to believe my religion, that is fine. If you wish to continue to believe in yours, that is fine" but the important thing is to find the commonality between the religions and work on those points. You can have a million different individuals that have all different beliefs on everything and to force them to believe one thing or ten things instead of a million is impossible, you will not be able to get all of them to believe in one thing. They all have different variations and different beliefs of the same thing or of groups of things. So therefore you cannot achieve a universal spiritual religion, it has to be for the individual. The best way to look at it would be to say you have a million people and a million different religions, if they are all Roman Orthodox, Greek Orthodox, Russian Orthodox, they are of a different religion individually. Even if it was just the one, the Roman Orthodox and you have a million people, that is a million different religions, a million little variations on the same thing but enough that everybody will be of a different religion. So to have a religion that is based on one belief or one set of beliefs is wrong because everybody believes something different. Even only infinitely small, it is still a difference that will cause problems but to accept them for those beliefs is the important thing. Accepting a million different individuals in the Roman Orthodox that have a million different religions going under the same name, accept them for who they are, not for the religion because they all believe differently.

Russ: uh huh. Now one thing I've noticed is it's a lot better. It used to be no matter where you lived, if you didn't believe in one thing, you could be not only persecuted but killed and all over the world the same exact thing has happened. Now you have such a freedom of religion, is there a point now where we're seeing where all this freedom is going to possibly lead to more openness….

Omal: I hope so.

Russ: in consciousness?

Omal: I hope so but I cannot answer that question. This setup that we have is not new, this using a host to talk to you is not new, it is even recorded in your scripture, in many different scriptures.

Skip: uh-huh.

Omal: Allah talked through the prophet Mohammed, Yahweh talked through the prophet Elijah, Jehovah talked through the prophet Moses, isn't that channeling?

Russ: yeah, the Greeks had their Oracle at Delphi.

Omal: uh-huh.

Russ: uh-huh.

Omal: but yet this setup is looked upon as strange, as nonconformist because it is not a religious setup.

Skip: black magic is what a lot of people say it is.

Omal: yes. I’m going to ask a question again, I’ve asked it in the past, what does occult mean and how is it used today?

Skip: cults is a collection of individuals that’s…..okay my interpretation but it's not everybody’s okay? My interpretation, an evil association, a belief that dominates other people’s thoughts.

Omal: okay Russ.

Russ: a cult is a collection of individuals who hold the same ideas and ideals and meet to discuss those ideals.

Omal: no, both of you are wrong.

Skip: okay.

Omal: the word occult means hidden.

Russ: oh, occult.

Omal: have you ever heard of a occultation of the planets or an occult of Venus?

Russ: uh-uh.

Skip: uh-uh, no.

Omal: okay an occult of Venus is where Venus is hidden. Or an occult of Jupiter or to use a more common name occultation which means the same thing, hidden.

Russ: oh.

Omal: one is hidden by the other. In the term that is used to describe religion, an occult is a hidden knowledge, it’s hidden. So you could say the priest going into the temple and coming out with a candle that is lit is an occult event, it is hidden. The priest going into his little cubicle and then somebody going into the cubicle next to him to confess, that is hidden from view. So is that not also occult?

Russ: uh-huh.

Skip: okay.

Omal: but yet those are very much part of the dominant religion, or one of the dominant religions of your planet.

Skip: uh-huh. The funny part of it is, almost every religion came from the Christians, Catholics excuse me….

Omal: or well you can take it one step further back, the majority came from the Jewish faith.

Skip: true.

Omal: the story of Isaac and what was brother called, Ishmael?

Russ: uh-huh.

Skip: uh-huh.

Omal: well Ishmael, was he not one of the founders of the Muslim faith? I seem to see a problem there on the friction.

Skip: and the Koran has got the same stories in it as the King James bible.

Omal: uh-huh and the Torah.

Skip: which amazes me.

Omal: but again, what one thing in common do those religions have that Kiri mentioned?

Skip: love thy neighbor.

Omal: correct. But to accept an individual for their religious belief regardless of whether it is making a sacrifice of a lamb or praying to a man that was crucified.

Skip: uh-huh.

Omal: it is unimportant, it is accepting the individual for their belief. Neither is right and neither is wrong, both are right and both are wrong and Kiri actually is a very religious individual, she worships in her own unique way and she is accepted for that.

Skip: don’t we all?

Omal: true.

Skip: even in our world we worship in our own way, all of us do.

Omal: uh-huh. There is no wrong as long as you understand that there is no wrong to believe what you believe and no wrong in the person next to you believing something different. Or the next person or the person down the street or the person at the bus stand of the person standing in line to buy tickets for entertainment.

Skip: as long as they don’t impose their beliefs on somebody else.

Omal: that is correct, that is where it becomes wrong. When you turn around and try to dominate somebody and tell them that you must believe my religion.

Skip: uh-huh and it happens so often.

Omal: unfortunately, I’ve seen it thousands of times over hundreds of years. Let me rephrase that, I’ve seen that many times over the last 10,000 years.

Skip: "and if you don’t believe my way you die".

Omal: exactly and it is wrong. Unfortunately it is not just a human condition to fight. There are too many species throughout the galaxy, throughout the universe that have the same intent on fighting, some are more ferocious than others but it is a survival mechanism created through evolution that if you weren’t a fighting species, you would be no more advanced than the feline.

Skip: that’s right.

Omal: so to condone violence and fighting is in actual fact wrong. I’m not saying it is right to be violent but violence got you where you are. Being the meanest, strongest, most thinking ape in the jungle came to where you are now.

Skip: even our technology has come miles from combat.

Omal: your moist useful tool, the computer, is that not a combat weapon?

Skip: yes it is.

Omal: what was it designed for?

Skip: originally I think it was designed for radar.

Omal: close, it was actually designed for tracking incoming ballistics and being able to send ballistics.

Skip: wait a minute, it was before that wasn’t it? Excuse me, I don’t mean to correct you, I didn’t mean it that way.

Omal: continue.

Skip: but radar was even before ballistic missiles.

Omal: I am incorrect in saying ballistic, I should say projectile.

Skip: okay, okay, I’ll go with that one. And so it was a radar setup basically?

Omal: it kind of happened with both.

Skip: okay.

Omal: you needed one to get to the other.

Skip: because it happened during the first part of the Second World War.

Omal: it happened a little bit before I believe when they’re working with radar and using it to track incoming projectile objects.

Skip: yeah, aircraft and so on and so forth.

Omal: that’s correct.

Skip: I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to….

Omal: they also used it to be able to send those projectile objects.

Skip: and from there it just kept developing.

Omal: that is correct. So the technology is nearly 70 years old.

Skip: uh-huh, uh-huh, yeah. It's advanced to the point that most people don't even understand it.

Omal: true but we have a resident expert on antique computers. Unfortunately he is unavailable at the moment because he is busy working with the conference setup. Okay, any more questions?

Skip: no.

Russ: no.

Skip: no, thank you.

Omal: you are welcome.