(Omal compares the
educational levels of people working in the
government and now and also from twenty years
ago. His conclusion is that it is decreasing and
people need to have a more active role in their
children’s education.)
Omal: questions.
Russ: hmm okay, Tia was
talking to us about Mexico
and the problems they’re
having down there and with
those problems that
they’re having, how is our
government do you feel
going to respond to that?
Omal: give them financial
aid and support, try to
subsidize their operations
of industry. In turn,
creating a false economy
and when a false economy
runs out what happens?
Things go kaput.
Russ: right.
Omal: and I will make a
quote, "if you want to be
happy for a day kill a
pig".......no, "if you
want to be fed for a day
kill a chicken. If you
want to be fed for a week
kill a pig. If you want to
be fed for life learn to
fish". In other words,
what they need to do is
learn to support
themselves, not surviving
on handouts.
Russ: yeah but they’re
sort of used to it by now.
I mean it’s just like
welfare people up here….
Omal: correct.
Russ: they’re used to it
and I think the point's
past where they could get
to self-support.
Nicole: maybe they just
don’t haven’t got the
initiative because the
government has taken so
much away from them?
Omal: that is very likely.
After all, Mexico does
have a very high tax rate,
it also has some very lax
laws which contributes to
corruption.
Russ: hmm, so essentially
what we’re looking at is
both Mexico and ourselves
doing without government.
Omal: you need a group of
elected officials to
represent you on the world
stage….
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: so therefore a
government is necessary
but a large government
like Mexico has, like your
country, Canada, France,
most of the world as a
matter of fact, having a
large governmental body
and a large bureaucracy
under that governmental
body is a drain on the
people. How many percent
of your population works
for the government in one
capacity or another?
Russ: hmm, I don’t have
any numbers.
John: about a quarter or
20% or so?
Omal: I think it is a
little less, I think it is
about 18%.
John: 18%?
Omal: now if you travel
backwards in time 200
years to when your country
was just a young nation,
do you know what
percentage of the
population at that time
worked for the government?
Russ: hmm?
Omal: less than 1%, much
less.
John: yeah that’s what I
would guess, yeah.
Russ: wow.
Omal: and your country did
extremely well without
such a large governmental
body. Admittedly it was a
smaller population but in
proportion there were far
fewer people working for
the government.
Russ: is this just because
of the lack of educational
levels that were available
at the time?
Omal: actually the
educational levels, the
standards were quite high
for those people that
could get education.
However, being a pioneer
society at that time, it
was hard for people to get
education and those that
had were in high demand.
Education was certainly
very prevalent. If you
just walk down the street
you will see old schools.
If you go down to the
valley to the east of you
you’ll see old schools,
single room schools.
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: and the educational
levels were much higher.
Russ: I see.
Omal: that is part of the
problem of a bureaucracy
is that education no
longer plays an important
part. What is the average
reading level of a child
that leaves school today
compared to one that left
let’s say 20 years ago?
John: sixth or seventh
grade.
Russ: no I’d say higher,
I’d say more like around
10th, 11th.
Nicole: yeah, same in our
country.
Omal: but it is less than
it was when people 20
years ago were leaving
school….
Russ: right.
Omal: much less. The
average college student
has a very poor education
and is very poorly
prepared in your country
for going to college,
especially children from
the large inner cities
where the actual level of
reading skill is lower.
Russ: well has the
emphasis on education
changed then?
Omal: yes.
Russ: to what?
Omal: to a liberal form of
education, you do not push
the child because you do
not wish the child to feel
bad, you have to build up
the child’s esteem of
itself. Which in a certain
extent, yes that is a good
idea however if you take
it too far, then it fails
and fails dramatically.
Russ: hmm, okay. Now back
then though, I mean you
had a choice between going
to school or working on
your father’s farm…
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: or whatever business
he was doing. You learned
your father’s business
because someday you would
be taking that over.
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: you didn’t have the
proportion of people who
went to school. I mean
here you have mandatory
school for everyone….
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: back then it was
optional.
Omal: yes and the standard
of education was much
higher.
Russ: right.
Omal: most people,
especially the pioneers,
were very literate. It is
common for a country to
lose its productive
proportion because they
see their own country
becoming unproductive and
they want to continue
being productive so they
move somewhere else were
they can. Productive
people tend to be
intelligent, intelligent
people tend to be
literate.
Russ: I see. Well back
then parents would teach
their children….
Omal: at home.
Russ: at home
whereas now people just
kick their kids off to
school and trust the
school to do all the
work for them.
Omal:
teachers are paid quite
well however some of the
teachers are very poor
in education. It became
a popular pursuit to
become a teacher, the
market was flooded with
teachers and in turn the
demand for teachers was
decreased, the pay scale
dropped, all the good
ones dropped out, what
are you left with?
Russ: hmm, you're left
with people who aren’t
teaching our children
the way they should be.
Omal: there are always
the exceptions to the
rules.
Russ: so now more than
ever, self-education
should be the….
Omal: should be….
Russ: the goal of
everyone.
Omal: correct. There is
a gentleman that I am
aware of through various
sources who was taught
at home. The gentleman
is about 80, he is a
computer you might say
wizz kid, he is very
literate. His education
has been finished off in
a public school whereas
he is looked upon as
being very, very smart.
Russ: hmm.
Omal: but he is no
smarter than anybody
else, it’s just that he
has been educated.
John: well isn’t there a
dramatic increase in
people educating their
children at home?
Omal: I believe so yes.
John: yes, I do believe
that’s true. Because we
do have the technology
nowadays where you can
do it but you’ve got to
be a good, conscientious
parent to do that.
Omal: and to push them
to do their work. It has
been a long time since I
have been a parent.
Russ: uh-huh, okay. So
what do we get from all
of this then?
Omal: you get from all
this that education is
very important. The
people that are out
there are not very
literate, they do not
have a very strong
linguistic ability of
even their own language.
Russ: uh-huh, okay.
Omal: you could think of
yourselves as being very
lucky to be
well-educated. I’m not
fully versed on the
young lady’s area of
education from her area
but I assume that it is
of a high standard as
she is quite eloquent
when she has spoken.
Nicole: thank you Omal.
Omal: you’re welcome.
Nicole: that’s a nice
complement.
|