(Kiri gives her version of coercion 101 with all the little steps needed to begin once the morals have been locked into place and reasons to coerce are well understood. She manages to coerce two people at once in a demonstration of her skill and lists almost every great world leader and their skills at coercion.) 

---

Russ: hi Kiri.

Kiri: yo, dudes. Okay......oh I’m terribly sorry, you shouldn’t make yourself so comfortable.

(speaking to a cat she had disturbed)

Kiri: now to answer your coercive question, how are you feeling?

John: how am I feeling?

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: I’m feeling fine.

Kiri: how are you really feeling?

John: a little under the weather and…..

Kiri: a little bit down and…….

John: a little bit down and depressed.

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: yeah I don’t have no money, I don’t have no honey, my truck’s broke, I don’t have a full-time job, oh yeah it’s been a…..intense, stressful situation for me, no doubt about that.

Kiri: now what makes you so talkative?

John: well you asked me a question, I wanted to be honest.

Kiri: uh-huh, why did you want to be honest?

John: because you asked me a straightforward question and I believe the more honest we are, the further I can progress from a third dimensional state to a sixth dimensional state. The more knowledge I obtain, the easier my progression will be.

Kiri: what is that look for Russ?

Russ: well I know where this conversation is going, I'm getting some more tea, want some love?

John: yeah sure honey.

Kiri: oh you’re going as well? I was just giving you a demonstration on coercion.

John: oh were you?

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: I’m going to coerce myself another cup of tea.

Kiri: I just opened him up and had him talking like a book and what does he do? Runs off, doesn’t thank me.

(sighs in mock exasperation)

Kiri: so how are you doing David? Yes I’ve heard all about your knee problem, I’ve heard all about your disappointment about the ski season so far……or snowboard season? Sorry.

David: yeah, I'm trying real hard not to be a stressful person.

Kiri: you ought to take a lesson from Mark, he’s very stressful at the moment. Thank you.

Russ: my pleasure.

Kiri: second question, why did you get up and get me a cup of tea?

Russ: oh because I wanted one.

Kiri: came on you though didn’t it?

(Russ starts singing)

Russ: I got the Kiri blues.

Kiri: two at a time, I’m getting good, I am the champion. Now, back to shielding against coercion. Against me using Mark’s energy you’ve got a tough time. Me against you person-to-person, no joy. However……

John: what did you say, no joy?

Kiri: yeah, no joy.

Russ: an English expression for no kills on a mission.

Kiri: okay, now coercion. Now, what you have to do is focus on somebody as thus right? Think a thought and to start off with we suggest like come, go, sit, stand, tea, drink, lie down, stand up, walk, talk and so on. You think this one word, you visualize the word. For example, talk and you look at the person and you get them to talk or stand, right? You visualize the word in your head, you visualize them standing up and what do they do Russ?

Russ: well they tend to stretch their legs, that’s when I do it.

David: at least you got him to move.

Kiri: uh-huh, he’s part of the way there. All sorts of things, you think with one word, you visualize it in big, mighty big letters and you look at them and you smile and you get them to stand.

John: can we skip over the preliminary’s and like make someone’s head blow off their body?

Kiri: no, no.

John: oh okay, so I guess I’m going to have to start with the simple techniques first?

Kiri: that’s right. Now there are certain ground rules because coercion can be used to get one’s personal gain. If you are a great orator, take for example……you seem to have a thing about the guy with the mustache and the short attitude and the corporal.

David: I think he was an insane idiot.

Kiri: but he was a very strong coercer.

David: oh I really like the way…..he was a good orator.

Kiri: uh-huh.

David: he was just a maniac but he was a genius maniac.

Kiri: yeah, the border between genius and madness is very narrow. Another person, Joseph Stalin……very great orators, Winston Churchill, Roosevelt, Lincoln, all great orators. All very good at communicating to get people to believe their ideas. It is also in the way that they carry themselves, notice that they all stand up straight, they don’t slouch when they talk. They talk with passion, they use their arms, they generate this huge field to coerce a lot of people. So therefore you’ve got to learn how to coerce with words before you can coerce mentally and then from mentally you’ve got to go on. But, if you take people like Hitler and Stalin, they’re corrupt because what they wanted was world domination for their own personal gain. You take Roosevelt, Lincoln, Washington, all your great American people, Ronald Reagan, they coerce for the common good, a little bit for personal gain as well. So, normally when you coerce for personal gain, things go wrong. You end up being disliked, shot at, killed, blown up, poisoned, going crazy. So therefore you’ve got to be careful when you coerce in a negative way. Now here’s a question for you Johnny, a nice situation for you. You are a very clever coercer like myself right? I go for a job interview and I need a job. I coerce the person for the job, is that good or bad?

John: it’s good.

Kiri: tell me why.

John: because I wouldn’t use that technique unless I was in a desperate situation and needed a job desperately.

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: and with what I do for a living, cooking…..

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: eating goes hand-in-hand with it.

Kiri: oh exactly.

John: a cook won’t starve to death, I don’t care what the company policy is…..

Kiri: uh-huh, you’ve got to sample the food.

John: I’ve got to.

Kiri: so therefore……

John: I’m forced into it.

Kiri: yeah, so therefore using your coercion to get a job right? You coerce the person into giving you the job. You’re doing something for yourself but you’re also doing something for them because you are a talented chef. All chefs think they’re great and I mean that in a complementary way, that’s what makes them good. So, in return they bring their style and flair to that place and if it is marketed correctly, that place thrives. Take your place in Sedona, "Judi’s". Before you got there what was it? It was a okay restaurant wasn’t it?

Russ: hole the wall.

John: yeah it was a okay hole in the wall surviving on a shoestring.

Kiri: and when you got there and after a year or two what happened? Tah-dah!!! Johnny arrived, everything went great.

John: yeah, we expanded the menus, we increased the food quality, we increased the amount of business and revenue.

Kiri: uh-huh.

John: I also in turn increased my wages proportionally.

Kiri: uh-huh and you became a very important part of the team.

John: that’s true.

Kiri: so therefore you brought something as an employee to the company.

John: no doubt about it.

Kiri: it certainly benefited them. So by using a coercive means, it works two ways. You survive or I would survive if I was a chef and you do wonderful things for the company. So therefore using coercion in a negative form can actually turn into a positive form in that sense whereas if you go for a job that you really don’t need that you’re going to rip off the company and you coerce them, that’s bad. So you see that it is….

David: but you’re taking away somebody’s own decision making……..you’re not allowing them to decide for themselves who they think the best cook would be.

Kiri: sometimes people’s decisions are flawed.

David: yeah but everybody thinks their way of thinking is right.

Kiri: uh-huh. You're quite correct but by putting yourself in a situation where you benefit them and they benefit you it’s a mutual thing. After a while it doesn’t matter whether you coerce them or not, the fact remains such as "Judi’s" that the place blossomed with the help of Johnny. So if he had coerced for a job it would have probably happened quicker. If he learns how to coerce here, the same thing could happen but it also depends on I believe marketing as well. You can have the greatest food in the world and if it’s not marketed properly……..so coercion, coercion can have a positive effect. Even though you do take away the person’s free will, it is only for a one-off. On the other hand, if you take away their free will in a negative way, for example let us take…..I can’t think of anybody new, I suppose we could go back to the Little Cpl. again but I’m sick of the Little Cpl. Anybody else sick of him?

John: yeah, I don't want to hear anything else about Hitler.

Kiri: okay another, a little captain from France, great coercer.

John: oh Napoleon?

Kiri: uh-huh, great coercer, another great one. Tell me, did Napoleon do anything good?

Russ: uh-huh.

David: yeah.

Kiri: what did he do good?

David: he turned France into a world power.

Kiri: uh-huh.

David: somewhat European power.

Kiri: uh-huh.

David: and made everybody there kind of…..

Kiri: feel good about themselves.

David: feel prosperous yeah and brought back their patriotism.

Kiri: uh-huh. But he gave something again as a coercer much more important. Russ....

Russ: uh-huh.

Kiri: what’s your answer?

Russ: he brought in a order to things where before it was pretty well messed up.

Kiri: uh-huh but he brought one very important thing and it's close to order. He brought the law that they still use and thank you Tia, the law that they still use in their country today was invented partly by Napoleon. A little bit like George Washington in your country and the founding parents.

Russ: hmmm.

David: didn’t he put a lot of people in graves though?

Kiri: yes, that’s the negative side. He dominated and killed thousands and thousands of people so therefore he was a border point good, bad coercer and what happened to him? He died very young. So coercion, what have we learned tonight? You have to control it very, very carefully otherwise you get beyond your wildest dreams and you go crazy, simple as that, you become a very bad person. Do we have any questions?

John: yeah, can you give us any advice on techniques and tools to use so we don’t abuse coercion and coercive powers and shielding?

Kiri: here’s the biggest tool, here and here, does it feel right? Certainly some of the bad people have always thought it felt right but is it really right, does it benefit you and you alone or does it benefit the other person? These are questions that you have to ask yourself and if it feels good here and the answer here is that it benefits both parties or it benefits them more than it benefits you, then it’s good. Take Mark’s current problem. If he coerces her, he’s taking away her learning experience. If he doesn’t coerce her, she proceeds down the way where she will never learn. So what does he do? Pulls out his hair, goes crazy and get stressed out about it. Does it benefit her? Certainly it does take away the problems and it does help her but does she learn? Yes she does learn but why doesn’t he coerce her? I don’t know, he won’t let me in and you guys have gone mighty quiet.

Russ: oh well, I thought it was a rhetorical question.

Kiri: well nevermind.

Russ: I’ve got other questions besides coercion so I’ll wait until the coercion questions get answered.

Kiri: okay, any more questions on coercion?

John: no, not for me thank you, you’ve been very informative.