(A discussion on foul
language being so prevalent in contrast to earlier
generations gives Omal a good reason to then talk
about the growing moral decay being symptomatic of
a failing society. A strength of belief in being
humans first and whatever ethnic background second
would possibly reverse that growth.)
Omal:
okay, do we pick a
topic or do we discuss
things at random?
Russ: well one thing I
wanted to work on a
little bit was the
shooting that did
happen in the suburbs
of Denver and the
ability of people to
snap. Whereas, as Kiri
was saying, there’s a
point where the moral
base that people work
from in the past has
been stronger than it
has been now
apparently…..
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: and the ability
to snap and just lose
it all in a moment or
even pre-plan it for
days or a week seems
to have gotten less
and less.
Omal: yes?
Russ: is as she was
saying it is a sign of
the times, was it
media related perhaps?
Omal: perhaps yes, it
is definitely the
moral issue that life
has become cheap, that
you do see as Kiri put
it so much death and
destruction on your
entertainment devices.
It has become popular
entertainment to watch
people being maimed
and killed whether it
is in a
pseudo-entertainment
world or in actual
fact on your news
services.
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: pick a movie.
Russ: "Groundhog Day".
Omal: is there
somebody killed in
that?
Russ: many times.
Omal: correct.
Skip: yes, yes, yes.
Omal: pick another
one.
Russ: "Fantasia"?
Omal: are there people
being killed in that?
Russ: yeah,
absolutely.
Skip: in what?
Russ: "Fantasia", from
Disney.
Omal: I am not
familiar with
"Fantasia" nor was I
familiar with
"Groundhog Day". Okay
let’s pick another
one.
Russ: go ahead Skip.
Skip: you mean violent
ones?
Omal: any.
Russ: no just
anything.
Skip: well even the
cartoons that the kids
watch which are what,
five minutes of
cartoons or ten
minutes? They’re
beating up on each
other, they’re killing
each other and
everything else.
Omal: so therefore it
is a part of society
accepted, most people
until recently it
seems to me were aware
that that was for
entertainment and it
was not real. Now the
lines have become
blurred because of
your news media
showing people getting
shot, blown up,
running out of houses
on fire, bombs being
dropped, being shot on
beaches, being shot at
vacation resorts, at
high schools, at
colleges, at
universities and they
hear all the gory
details and see all
the gory details that
they become numb to it
so therefore it loses
its value as life.
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: so it is
definitely a sign of
the times, whether or
not it is a sign of an
end or a beginning is
unknown.
Skip: yeah that’s the
media’s fault.
Omal: I wouldn’t say
just the media, I
would say it's people
in general being
prepared to sit down
and see these events
as it happens. It is a
negative side of the
technology
communication
revolution.......
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: the fact that
the morals seem to
have gone by the
wayside.
Russ: hmm.
Skip: yeah they have.
Russ: interesting. In
dealing with it then,
an individual’s morals
are what are really
important for now and
to pass those onto
others that you deal
with.
Omal: correct.
Skip: but they’re not
being passed on,
that’s the problem.
Russ: well you and I
and Mark, we pass our
morals on.
Skip: okay, present
company excepted…..
Russ: right.
Skip: but the young
people growing up,
their folks aren’t
teaching them the
morals like we were
taught.
Russ: hmm. Omal is
this maybe a problem
of single families, or
single-parent families
perhaps?
Skip: no not really,
even double-parent
families……single-parent
families it used to be
that you didn’t, you
didn’t live with
another person unless
you were married, now
it’s an accepted thing
for two people to live
together period.
Omal: Skip is quite
correct.
Russ: uh-huh
Skip: and that’s the
beginning of your
breakdown of your
morals right there,
that’s the start of
it. And using vulgar
or cursing language,
there’s another
problem.
Omal: uh-huh.
Skip: the parents use
it, the kids use it
and it's accepted all
over even the films
and movies and it is
using the vulgar
language which if we
used vulgar language
when I was a kid you
get your mouth washed
out with soap.
Russ: yeah I
threatened one of my
kids that was playing
games tonight with
that so I’m seeing it
more and more.
(from an incident at
the cyber cafe I
co-owned at the time)
Skip: yeah you're
seeing it all the time
and even in feature
films that are
entertainment, the
people are using foul
language. They use
four letter words like
they’re running out of
style.
Omal: again Skip is
quite correct, it is
something that can be
changed. If you start
at an early age that
you do not use curse
words, foul or abusive
language, especially
around a child and an
infant, therefore it
teaches even at an
early age that it is
wrong. And if you
explain later to a
child that the reason
that the child mustn't
use the language even
at school with the
companions of the
child is because the
child by not falling
in with those word
structures becomes
superior, becomes
morally better,
becomes educationally
better, is looked upon
with more respect. At
first it will be
looked upon as the
child is a wimp but if
the child holds to the
patterns laid down by
the parent or parents,
then the child becomes
morally better and in
later life looked upon
and respected as long
as the child also acts
with strength. And if
the child is
instructed in a way
that uses the child’s
mind, that it can
resort to name-calling
so the other children
do not understand that
they're being
name-called increases
a child’s intellect
and also makes a child
realize that it can
help it's friends in
the same way. One drop
of water can be the
drop of water that
overflows the bucket.
Russ: hmmm.
Omal: or fills the
vessel to full,
whatever you wish to
phrase it as but it is
important from the
get-go that there is
no foul or abusive
language. Continue.
Skip: what I keep
running into and it’s
not my generation but
the generation that
Mark and Russ are more
or less in which would
be what? Two
generations behind me?
Russ: more or less.
Skip: yeah………..is even
the ladies that have
children are using
foul and abusive
language even around
their children.
Omal: which is totally
wrong and
unacceptable.
Skip: but everybody, I
say everybody, I’m
using terminology of
what I’ve run into
accepts it and by
accepting it they're
tearing up their own
morals, their own
loyalty, their
own……..when I was a
kid patriotism and
loyalty was something
that made you glow
from the inside but
there isn’t any of
that left anymore. The
same with journeyman
doing their job,
there’s no
craftsmanship left
anymore or it seems
not to be okay? In my
own personal looking
at things, we’ve
gotten to a point of
where they’ve made
this a throwaway
world.
Omal: you again are
very correct, it is
definitely changing.
Whether it is changing
for the better or for
the worse is something
that is yet to be seen
but, it is definitely
the pangs of a society
that is changing.
Whether or not there
will be a few voices
in the wilderness such
as yourselves that
say, “stop, this is
enough, it must
change.” The old ways
were probably correct,
the new ways are
probably incorrect or
correct depending on
your point of view…..
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: but blending the
two together.
Certainly having a
higher technology but
having the
intelligence to use
the technology in such
a way that it benefits
all and lays a moral
pathway that is
beneficial for all.
Russ: well Skip brings
up a good point on the
question of
patriotism. It seems
now with the advanced
communication
abilities of both the
media and the
Internet, patriotism
seems to have fallen
by the wayside and we
seem to be on that
road. Now the question
I have is again as you
mentioned is it for
the good or for the
bad? Now one would say
yes it’s for the good
because patriotism
brings a good sense of
unity to the country
you’re in but at the
same time our efforts
to change to a more
world united planet
would seem be pushing
in the direction that
says well maybe
patriotism toward a
species as us being
humans or a species
being involved with
living on one planet
might be important for
the future also?
Omal: yes but
also……..sorry,
continue.
Skip: but what’s
happening here is
that’s not happening,
people are losing
patriotism in their
country or their
ethnic background or
their religion or
whatever or their
country but they’re
not replacing it with
the patriotism of
earthlings or humans
or whatever. It’s not
being replaced, it’s
just being thrown
away.
Omal: again Skip is
very correct, you’re
doing very well
tonight as well I
might add.
Skip: thank you.
Omal: I believe it was
Kiri that was
discussing pride in
one’s ethnic group.
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: I believe it was
in connection with the
comment of aren’t you
earthlings after all?
And Kiri said……her
answer was well I am
Sirian first but I’m
also from the
highlands second. It
is good to have pride
in your ethnic
heritage…..
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: in your ethnic
group. So it would be
equally wise and
sensible to have pride
in the fact of first
of all you’re human
but secondly you’re
Americans…..
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: and thirdly, you
are of Native American
descent or Polish
descent or German
descent or Irish or
all of the above but
you are Americans
secondly and humans
first.
Russ: no one seems to
be pushing that end of
it though you’re
right, no one’s
replacing it with
anything.
Skip: that’s it
exactly.
Russ: I think
something should be
done, maybe we should
replace it with
something.
Omal: maybe the talk
here now should be
turned into action.
Don’t forget, you may
be the little drops
that are prelude to
the storm, the shower,
the rain cloud burst.
Russ: I absolutely
agree, sure.
Skip: I understand.
Russ: I mean what we
have at tools
available, quite easy
to do actually. It'd
take a long time to
get going but time is
all we have left.
Skip: well…..
Russ: lessons to be
learned, it’s a good
lesson.
Skip: hmm.
Russ: I mean some of
the groups that have
pushed for something
similar, for example
Earth First and
Greenpeace, things
like that have been
pushing more planet
awareness…..
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: more global
awareness have all
gone about it in a
almost terrorist
tactic kind of way.
Skip: sometimes they
do, yeah.
Omal: but they do not
have the structure.
They say we’re all
humans, humans first,
Earth first but they
do not replace it with
or have the structure
to say, “yes, we’re
all humans first but
you are Americans
secondly, you are
Germans secondly, you
are French secondly,
you are whatever
country you are living
in secondly. Having
pride in that area is
just as important as
having pride in the
whole entire planet.
After all, if you do
not have pride in your
area, how can you have
pride for the whole
entire planet?
Skip: yeah.
Omal: so by having
pride in the fact that
you are Americans,
Skip and Russ are
Americans secondly but
humans first. But it
is just as important
and equally as
important to have
pride in both as it is
equally important to
have a left and a
right, a night and a
day, a hot and a cold,
they are the partners
to each other. It is
the partnership of
Americans second but
earthlings first that
is the key. You can
say you're all humans
first and if you’re
all humans first then
you have to have you
are Americans, you are
Germans, you are
British, you are
French second.
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: but in actual
fact they are not
second, they're also
first but in your
analogies and
understanding it is
the wording.
Skip: uh-huh, uh-huh.
Russ: what comes after
that? For example are
we then living beings
first, earthlings
second….
Omal: (chuckles) let
us take one step at a
time.
Skip: in our 3-D
society I would say
that we're earthlings
or humans first.....
Omal: uh-huh.
Skip: and then we're
either Americans,
French, German or
whatever.
Omal: uh-huh.
Skip: then our ethnic
background…..
Omal: is third.
Skip: would be third.
Omal: that is quite
correct.
Skip: what I guess
irritates me more than
anything else is
somebody that comes
from a different
country into ours and
does nothing but tear
it down and yet
continues to stay here
and reap the benefits
of what we have put
out.
Omal: yes I understand
that that would be
frustrating.
Skip: and yet we can’t
throw them out just
because they have the
Second Amendment of
our Constitution the
freedom of speech.
Omal: correct.
Skip: not Second,
it’s….
Omal: it is….
Skip: Second is the
right to bear arms.
Omal: ahh, it is the
Fifth Amendment.
Skip: yeah.
Omal: no, the Fifth
Amendment is the
refusing to answer any
question on the
grounds that I may
incriminate myself.
Russ: I thought it was
the First Amendment?
Omal: the First
Amendment is freedom
of speech I believe..
Skip: oh okay, all
right, I had it messed
up, yeah.
Omal: the Fifth
Amendment is I refuse
to answer any question
on the grounds that I
may incriminate
myself.
Skip: right, the Fifth
Amendment…..
Omal: which is getting
some chuckles up here
by the way.
Skip: and yet people
use it.
Omal: yes, people that
shouldn’t use it use
it.
Skip: (chuckles) yeah
I know. You’re right,
the First Amendment is
the freedom of speech,
the Second Amendment
is the right to bear
arms.
Omal: Russ when you
come to this part
check and confirm that
so there is accuracy.
Russ: okay, I will.
Omal: it is important.
Russ: I’ll do some
heavy editing.
Skip: uh-huh, right.
Omal: even if it's
necessary to back and
edit and correct.
Skip: I think I’ve got
the amendments on a
plaque at home.
Omal: well there is a
mission for you, type
it up on your computer
and send it in e-mail
form as well as being
able to use your
computer as an
experiment. This is a
challenge, to convince
at least one person
that they're humans
first and American or
whatever nationality
they are second but
the fact being that
both are equal.
Russ: that’s easy for
me, I’ve got a webpage
to work with, that’s
my next editorial.
Omal: outside of the
webpage.
Russ: oh, outside of
the webpage.
Omal: correct,
convince one person.
Skip: I think what
bothers me more than
anything else about
patriotism and loyalty
is at one time our
flag was very sacred,
it didn’t touch the
ground, it was put up
in daylight and was
taken down at dusk, it
was only put up
certain ways. Now
people burn it, throw
it on the ground,
stomp on it and
everything else.
Omal: make clothing
out of it.
Skip: yes and it’s
very aggravating to me
because that’s a
symbol of our
country...............I’m
sorry.
Omal: oh that’s quite
correct I was thinking
and dwelling for a
second there.
Russ: yeah you got me
thinking and dwelling
too.
Skip: but that is,
that’s just like the
American bald eagle
and the American flag,
them are symbols of
our country and they
should be honored
highly.
Omal: uh-huh.
Skip: and they aren’t
anymore.
Russ: interesting, I
got the idea of an
Earth flag that would
also instill the
benefits of the
different countries.
Skip: uh-huh, uh-huh.
See from what I
understand, the UN is
starting to set this
thing up. When this
UN, the United Nations
was formed, this is
basically what they
were trying to do was
put the whole world
more or less under one
administration if you
want to call it that,
just a word okay? But
that’s the way it
looked to me like when
they first formed the
UN for all these
different countries to
come to one place to
try to solve the
problems of the world,
I think they’ve abused
it.
Omal: it is definitely
changed from what it
was supposed to be.
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: it is now almost
to the point of the
League of Nations.
Does anybody remember
what happened to the
League of Nations?
Russ: yeah, World War
I started.
Omal: no, it was
created after World
War I.
Russ: oh, World War II
then.
Omal: basically yes
and it failed, it
failed in its purpose
and goal.
Russ: well there’s
still problems with
the United Nations the
fact that only a few
major countries have
veto power......
Omal: uh-huh.
Skip: that's it
exactly.
Russ: because no
matter what everybody
else thinks, one
country can say,
“well, too bad.”
Skip: uh-huh and our
country, as young as
it is, it’s a baby of
the world more or less
is one of the greater
powers.
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: we exercise that
veto power quite a
bit.
Skip: and by being a
greater power they
more or less stomp on
the little people.
Omal: it states, “I
hold these facts to be
evident although the
will of the majority
must prevail in all
cases, the will of the
minority is also to be
taken into
consideration."
Skip: uh-huh.
Omal: I believe that
is a quote
from.....think it
was……
Russ: Abraham Lincoln?
Omal: no.
Russ: no?
Omal: no, it’s one of
the early founding
fathers and I admit
that I quoted probably
a little inaccurately.
Russ: “we hold these
truths to be
self-evident that all
men are created
equal…”
Omal: etc., etc.,
"although the will of
the majority must
prevail in all cases,
the minority etc.",
something else for you
to edit and look up,
but that is not
practiced in the
United Nations. The
country that preaches
it the most does not
practice it in the
United Nations.
Skip: no because they
have too much power.
Omal: correct, it is
unfortunately, should
be one vote one
country.
Skip: yeah but it
isn’t.
Omal: that is correct.
Okay, it is time for
me to depart.
Skip: okay, thanks
Omal.
Russ: thank you.
Omal: you are welcome.
Live long, prosper
and, I’ll be back.
(Ed. note- the exact
quote Omal referenced
is: "All, too, will
bear in mind this
sacred principle, that
though the will of the
majority is in all
cases to prevail, that
will to be rightful
must be reasonable;
that the minority
possess their equal
rights, which equal
law must protect, and
to violate would be
oppression."
-- Thomas Jefferson,
First Inaugural
Address, 1801)
|