(Omal takes us back
to the 50s when society’s morals were quite a bit
different than can be found now. His premise is
that the breakdown of morals leads to less of an
incentive to pursue spiritual growth. He uses an
example of a couple on the base as a learning aid
as to how it would be if we were ascended.)
Omal:
greetings and felicitations Russ.
Russ: greetings Omal.
Omal: she does work hard on her dissertation does
she not?
Russ: yes she does.
Omal: she does put a lot of passion into it.
Russ: very informative.
Omal: yes, she does work hard. Okay, let’s look at
Tia's first analysis of the stock market. She is
correct in every detail as always, accuracy seems
to be her middle name. I would like to expand upon
her explanation of the interference of
governmental agencies. When she talks of a
government fresh and interfering in a behavioral
pattern of a stock market, it works like a brake
being applied. When this brake is applied, things
slow down, growth slows down, confidence slows
down but when a government is hogtied with other
matters, all those breaks have been removed. It is
like a vehicle going downhill, when you have your
foot on the brake you control it, you control the
speed. When you take your foot off the brake, it
accelerates out of control and out of speed. This
occurs when situations conspire against
individuals. At the moment it is the brightest
part before the storm. Things are looking good.
The next year to a year and a half will tell what
is going to transpire. Okay let us look at Tia's
last comments on moral behaviors. Tia as we know
is a very moral individual, she holds her morals
up high. She has learned to be respecting of other
people’s opinions but to hold fast to her morals
of the family, behavior in public, language. Tia
may use Durondedunn phrases to swear but having
had to study a little bit of the language, her
phrases that she uses, the descriptive one of
fraugh is polite in actual fact. From what I have
learned, it means, "may you enjoy the flavor of my
after food as you munch on my underwear". That is
a correct translation, basically eat my shorts. So
Tia’s behavior is obviously stated in her views on
the morals and her views are very correct, they
are a sixth dimensional and a third dimensional
blending of moral opinions. And by having these
morals and trying to live by them is a good
indicator on how people should behave. She has
learned extremely well that the third dimensional
way has certain advantages and the sixth
dimensional way has certain advantages. Being of a
third dimensional ancestry, she has to deal with
those third dimensional mindset and thinking.
Living in a sixth dimensional workspace
environment, she has come to terms in being able
to refine her moral outlook on life which is a
good moral outlook on life. Tia does not lie, she
does not cheat, she does not bend the truth unless
it is necessary to protect. She has learned that
protecting friends, family, and associates is very
important, before it was just family. How does
that affect a third dimensional society such as
yours? Well having a high moral standard seems to
be able to focus somebody in a direct path that is
beneficial for enlightenment. If for example
taking the incident of Kelly Flynn, morals would
have dictated that first of all the first thing
that she did wrong was adultery, she destroyed a
marriage. What benefit did she get from destroying
a marriage? Well, she has been rewarded by people
asking for her to do book contracts. Is it correct
to idolize somebody that has committed adultery
and destroyed a marriage? I will let you decide
that. Secondly lying, not once but many times, is
that correct? Again I will let you decide.
Disobeying an order in an environment where orders
are important to be followed, again is this
correct? Regardless of the order, it is important
that the order be carried out as best as possible,
is that correct? I will again let you decide on
that. The development of a society depends on its
moral behavior. Tia is quite astute at perceiving
moral behavior and how it affects a growth or a
stunting in growth of a society. It is fine to be
tolerant and understanding but it is important
also to stick to one's moral opinion, to stick to
a moral pathway and not to deviate from that. It
is good to be open and to be able to look at
everything and to be able to come to a wise
conclusion but, if you have certain principles
that aid you in this, that give you the confidence
necessary to be a successful developed individual
in a spiritual and physical capacity, will lead
you to a higher enlightenment than just being a
person that goes, "I understand your point of
view, let me think on this, you may be right".
"Lying may be a good thing, let me think about
this". "Cheating on one’s husband or wife is a
good thing". These things obviously are not good
and by falling into that trap, society is affected
in a way that the level of behavior becomes lower.
When that occurs and people that expect lower
standards from other individuals, then again that
lowers itself again. When it becomes common to use
foul language in everyday conversation, then an
individual and a society if it becomes very
prevalent is in problems, serious problems. This
is one of the signs to look out for as things get
worse, when it becomes acceptable to use foul
language as part of a normal conversation. Where
it becomes acceptable to use F words and B words
and C words when talking to somebody and it is not
even an eye-raising experience. Okay, let us
answer your questions.
Russ: okay first off, on the issues on the stock
market. Now the point where the government
interferes, I noticed that our most current
example of where the government interferes is
where the federal exchange Chairman, I believe his
name is………
Omal: Greenspan.
Russ: Greenspan, he set the interest rates at a
higher rate than they had been before. At that
point though is the point where we saw the stock
market rise ever since then and it’s been on an
upswing since so at this point I’m wondering is
that perhaps an accident or did he actually do
some good there?
Omal: he intended it to go up. The reason why he
intended it to go up is that people will look at
the stock market and they see this action, the
stock market climbing higher and higher and they
feel good about that. People are making money,
people are doing well, it gives a false sense of
confidence. As Tia pointed out, with a growth rate
of only 1.2%, there is something wrong when that
is looked upon as great when in a normal booming
society, let us take the economy of Kennedy where
it was 5.2% through most of his living
administration, it was booming. What is the
difference there?
Russ: well the Kennedy administration came on
right at 1960 and at that point people looked
toward a new decade as opposed to the old decade
of the 50s known as the silent generation,
suddenly it was......and you can see it in much of
the culture.......a bright spot happening and I
feel that kind of caught on at a nationwide level.
Omal: but why didn’t it occur this time?
Russ: well, you right mean now?
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: well it’s not the 60s, the 60s were a time
of dreaming and hopes.
Omal: but not to start off with, there were a lot
of dark situations. The Bay of Pigs, the Cuban
missile crisis, the start of the Vietnam War, far
worse than what is happening now.
Russ: true but we're talking Kennedy and the
Vietnam war was post Kennedy.
Omal: it started in ‘64.
Russ: right, Kennedy was killed in 60…..
Omal: four.
Russ: four.
(Ed note: it was actually November 22nd, 1963)
Omal: Kennedy sent advisers into North
Vietnam.......or South
Vietnam rather in ‘63.
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: the war started then, it did not escalate to
the size until later but it started then. It did
not tear the country apart until later.
Russ: I think some of it actually might have to do
with music.
Omal: that came later.
Russ: well that’s true but just if you look at the
music of the 50s, even up to 59, and you look at
the music one year later, there are some very
marked changes there that I think had a bit to do
with it.
Omal: no.
Russ: no?
Omal: they were the result of what was going on.
Russ: hmm.
Omal: people were feeling good, people were
feeling great, life was wonderful.
Russ: well wasn’t this also the time the baby
boomers were starting to come along?
Omal: the baby boomers….
Russ: World War II?
Omal: correct.
Russ: and they were reaching their point of
maturing.
Omal: no, they were coming into the workplace.....
Russ: right.
Omal: but they were not reaching maturity.
Maturity comes later in life Russ.
Russ: okay.
Omal: okay, now the difference between then and
now is the moral outlook. They still had very high
moral standards. Somebody caught in an adulterous
affair was shunned and ostracized. Now, how many
people do you know that have had adulterous
affairs?
Russ: quite a few.
Omal: but back then it was almost unheard of. It
was either swept under the table and kept very
quiet or the person was ostracized and the court
case was nasty and bloody. As you said, they would
lose their children, they would lose a larger
percentage of their property than they would have
normally. Now, it’s no big deal. In fact as Tia
pointed out, sometimes it is used as a tool.
Russ: well the 60s did bring along that change
though with the Summer of Love, free love…..
Omal: uh-uh, that's too far, we’re talking about
the Kennedy administration.
Russ: oh okay.
Omal: not the Johnson administration. We are
talking between the difference between the Kennedy
administration and now and it is all one thing,
the morals.
Russ: hmm.
Omal: a frequent topic of conversation is the
president’s moral compass.
Russ: Kennedy had some very low morals though in
that respect.
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: his adulterous affairs, you could write
major books of and some have been written.
Omal: yes, they’re all written after his
death.....
Russ: after his death.
Omal: when they came to light, after he had been
assassinated. The current ones are coming to light
during the administration and it is not just one
or two or even three individuals, Kennedy is made
to look like a wimp compared to this individual.
Russ: but don’t we see the beginnings of this
then?
Omal: yes you do, you do. The moral standards were
already lowered after the administration
of....what’s his name? Ike, Eisenhower.
Russ: right.
Omal: it would’ve been better if Nixon had been
elected.
Russ: it would’ve kept the moral standards
higher……
Omal: and therefore the chance of what transpired
would’ve been lessened.
Russ: but then again we see a lot of good things
that came about because of Kennedy too.
Omal: correct.
Russ: the space program…..
Omal: correct.
Russ: much of the welfare system.
Omal: that goes back further actually.
Russ: oh it does?
Omal: yes, it goes back to FDR.
Russ: I knew it had something to do with something
like that.
Omal: yes he did, Bill of Rights.
Russ: yeah, Bill of Rights.
Omal: which is a great and wonderful thing. I am
not condemning Kennedy or any president including
this current one, I’m saying that it is a symptom
of a society that has become too opulent.
Russ: now what have those changes in the moral
systems have to do with the consciousness of the
country?
Omal: okay, where a moral behavioral pattern is
set in place…..for example, let us get back to
adultery. Where adultery becomes common, that sets
up a karmic distraction that has to be worked out.
When you are dealing with something of a situation
such as that, how can you think clearly on
spiritual matters?
Russ: uh-hmm.
Omal: you see the problem?
Russ: right.
Omal: let us say you are concerned with the
well-being of children?
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: you are concerned with getting as much as
possible for the children in the ensuing
separation so therefore you do not deal with the
spiritual matters that you should be, you do not
have time to sit down and deal with the spiritual
growth that you would normally go through. When a
situation occurs like that, you are more
preoccupied, you cannot think clearly. That half
an hour or an hour that you have set aside to sit
down and meditate, you're going to be thinking of
other matters. So therefore by a degradation in
moral structure leads to spiritual flatness where
it becomes flat, you are preoccupied with other
matters. Not of the development of yourself, your
spouse or your offspring.
Russ: hmm, okay.
Omal: but, there are exceptions to the rule.
Russ: right.
Omal: next question.
Russ: not to set any standards or to point any
fingers or anything, but personally looking at
Hades Base, it seems as though it’s more of a 60s
in their moral standards than there is more of the
50s.
Omal: yes but there is the moral standings of,
from what I have gathered, all the sexual antics
that go on, all people involved are aware of what
is going on. For example, let us take a secretary
that I have. She is in the early stages of
pregnancy. Her bond mate is very, very excited
about the upcoming child. Her boyfriend is also
ecstatic. It is her boyfriend’s first child. The
fact that all three individuals knew what was
going on makes the situation much easier. The fact
that the partner or the bond mate was very
consensual and said, "enjoy and I hope this works"
is something that is understood. So, all three
people agreed on what was happening. The reason
they agreed is the young gentleman, the father,
has some good genes. The mother has some great
genes. The bond mate, being in the medical
department, was aware of the potential for the
offspring and development. The agreement is that
all three people involved will be the parents
although the bond mate will be the primary male
parent. The other individual, the father of the
offspring, will be in a behavioral pattern of an
uncle even though the child is his. So therefore
by being of an intelligence level, they understand
that their actions and behavior has to be in such
a way that all benefit. You see what I’m saying?
Russ: of course, because I’m in the same situation
of course.
(Karra and Alana are both my bond mates)
Omal: correct.
Russ: okay, I think you said it best in your
dissertation when you mentioned the openness and
if the relationship does not affect...how did you
put it? The physical and spiritual well-being of
the people involved….
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: which I believe we are seeing on Hades Base
is, these sexual antics as you call them….
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: do not affect the physical or spiritual
well-being of the individuals.
Omal: in fact in this situation it enhances.
Russ: correct, correct. And I’m sure, just from my
viewing of all this, I bet it is true in all these
things that go on….
Omal: correct.
Russ: but I’m just saying from and outsider’s
point of view looking in on this would see a 60s
bacchanalia.
Omal: uh-huh.
Russ: and somebody with a more Puritan…..
Omal: attitude.
Russ: attitude, would turn their nose up and quite
literally frown heartily at this.
Omal: that is correct they would, but to
understand a society and to see the problems, you
have to have all the information and facts. An
individual that looks at something, turns up their
nose, says how horrible and degradated it is
without experiencing or receiving information on
that society is making a big mistake. We have the
information necessary to come to a formulated
answer on the situation on the morals in your
planet.
Russ: uh-huh.
Omal: an individual looking from the outside in on
our little group would have very little
information from that.
Russ: right.
Omal: and bacchanalia is a word I have not heard
in a long time......
(Russ starts to chuckle)
Omal: well not that long. Sometimes it seems like
a few moments and sometimes it seems like maybe a
few weeks.
Russ: well that’s why I'm looking forward to
possibly enlightening people over the fact that
there is a alternative towards the moral
degradation as being a more uplifting experience.
Omal: it is a spiritual level of awareness that
you have to achieve first. With that should come
the morals to be intelligent enough to understand
the actions.
Russ: uh-huh, correct. So you need to look at it
from that viewpoint….
Omal: yes.
Russ: as opposed to one more close minded.
Omal: correct. You first of all have to become
spiritually aware enough to understand that
sometimes things happen not for the better of an
individual but for the better of the group.
|