(Treebeard gets to the roots of reality and helps us define what is real and what are just aspects we meet. We go over the combined timelines of friends and family and discuss the cable of reality made up of an infinite number of threads. We also get into the reason we may experience déjà vu.) 

---

Treebeard: hmmm.

Russ: greetings Treebeard.

Treebeard: greetings, hmmm.

Skip: Treebeard?

Treebeard: yes.

Skip: that’s what I thought.

Treebeard: hmm, I am still being of dwelling on question from discussion of prior week. One moment, am focusing on now. 

Russ: okay.

Treebeard: I am being of semi-focused, let us be of discussing.

Russ: excellent and any more thoughts on that question?

Treebeard: I am still pondering various possible outcomes and ramifications of thought processes relating to therefore and of. 

Russ: excellent. 

Treebeard: Omal being of making of comment of characters from a book and characters falling by wayside and new ones being of replacing. Question being picking up off your mind and relaying to Omal from “Lord of Rings”. 

Russ: uh-huh.

Treebeard: comments of being to Sam and…..

Russ: Frodo?

Treebeard: being correct.

Russ: hmmm.

Treebeard: that being of good analogy that Omal look for.

Russ: uh-huh, it is and another part of the analogy is that those people who fell by the wayside eventually returned to rejoin the story.

Treebeard: being of correct.

Russ: right which is an analogy of how our reality takes us in the same way.

Treebeard: and being also of timelines weaving in and out and re-merging and splitting off again.

Russ: hmmm. So is this why past lives that you’ve lived with other people are so much more intense than just the familiarity of running into people from other timelines?

Treebeard: being of correct but being aspects of them within your timeline.

Russ: hmmm. So does that make them temporary?

Treebeard: no, being of aspects in your timeline.

Russ: hmmm.

Treebeard: you being aspect in their timeline. Please, I am just a Sirian, do not be of revering or of...

Russ: oh no, I’m just trying to figure it out, how that works. For example, what would be a good example? Laura okay? Laura and I perhaps have not met before in a past life.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Russ: but yet because it doesn’t seem like we really connect whereas Skip and I on the other hand for some reason connect more even though we haven’t been in a past life either. So Laura feels familiar, Skip feels like an old friend, why the difference?

Treebeard: are you being of sure that you have not been of past lives before?

Laura: I’m not, could of been.

Russ: could of been, yeah, it’s just…..

Laura: I mean we don’t always have the same facial features or whatever right in each one so......

Russ: right.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Laura: I mean…..

Treebeard: not even being of same gender always.

Laura: yes.

Russ: right.

Skip: and yet Laura and myself have been together before.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Laura: and I had the déjà vu that he rescued me before in a previous life.

Treebeard: uh-huh. So maybe not of being here and may being of great time since all three being woven together.......

Skip: uh-huh.

Treebeard: many great time, long great time.

Russ: so not necessarily here on this planet?

Treebeard: being of correct assumption.

Russ: ahh I get……

Treebeard: possible correct assumption.

Russ: so while it could be that I don’t remember Laura.......

Laura: yeah.

Skip: yeah.

Russ: not as much as I remember Skip.

Laura: or you were not supposed to remember.

Russ: right or we didn’t interact as much.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Skip: could be.

Laura: or there is nothing to be solved in this life between me and you.

Russ: correct, I see, I see. But you and Skip on the other hand do.

Laura: yeah.

Skip: yeah.

Russ: and me and Skip do.

Skip: yeah.

Treebeard: so therefore being of following through on assumptions, then there is being much to work out and for advancement.

Russ: uh-huh.

Skip: uh-hmmm.

Russ: because we’re all here together and we’re all working together to learn at the same time, then we're all following through on a past fellowship in another time perhaps?

Skip: or it’s something we did before.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: a fellowship of ring…..rings.

Russ: didn’t see that coming.

Treebeard: manipulation through mind and thought processes.

Russ: uh-huh.

Skip: hmmm, because I’m back, I shouldn’t be.

Laura: how come you shouldn’t be?

Treebeard: are you being of sure that you shouldn’t be?

Laura: yeah.

Skip: well I’ve still got to learn something or I shouldn’t be here.

Laura: so you should be here.

Treebeard: that is being correct young lady. If you did not have lesson to learn and you shouldn’t be here, then that would be an improbability but obviously something being necessary of learning brings you back to this point so therefore you have to be here.

Russ: you have to remember also, our lifetime here isn’t all that long on this planet comparatively.

Laura: yeah.

Skip: no it isn’t.

Russ: so what we’re accomplishing here is only something that I guess we’ve agreed upon it would only take us to the end of our lifetime……this is a long shot here but….

Laura: I feel like I’ve been here forever.

Russ: but I’m grasping. But if it wasn’t, we’d be in another place with a longer timeline span right Treebeard?

Treebeard: being of possible outcome yes.

Russ: okay, hmmm. Yeah because we could all be back on the same planet where Skip has the big trees.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: hmmm, trees of great girth and wisdom being of warm, comfortable.

Russ: right.

Treebeard: hmm.

Russ: it’s like a home, each tree is a home.

Skip: yeah, it’s mine.

Russ: right.

Treebeard: and you are its.

Skip: true.

Treebeard: it is being of a symbiotic relationship, one being part of the other but being separate but needed.

Russ: okay, with your life with plants.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Russ: plants don’t do the same thing humans do they where a plant will split off and have another aspect of itself somewhere else unless the person who it’s with breaks off let’s say. How does that work?

Treebeard: all things being of aspects, all being on different aspects, all being.

Russ: so we’re all aspects?

Treebeard: correct.

Russ: where’s the real one of us?

Laura: real one?

Russ: real one of us.

Treebeard: define what is being of real.  

Russ: ahh well there’s the question.

Skip: that would be the challenge.

Russ: right, so we’re an aspect of an aspect of an aspect of an aspect.

Laura: which is the real? And each is the real one.

Russ: all right. Now would that be the super conscious now?

Treebeard: super consciousness being present in all but for each aspect.

Russ: right, now would that be the real one of us and we’re aspects of the super consciousness?

Treebeard: you are being real, I am being real, you are being real, you are being real, the feline is being real. The super conscious of all being real for that timeline. On each timeline it is being real and each being having of super conscious.

Russ: okay, so each aspect is real?

Treebeard: yes.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: hasty word for something so more important.

Russ: well I agree.

Treebeard: question?

Russ: okay.

Treebeard: why you have such important word but so small?

Russ: real?

Treebeard: no…..yes.

Russ: I don’t know.

Treebeard: being……

Russ: I don’t even know what its root is.

Treebeard: yes being of great importance.

Russ: yeah, very much so. Maybe that’s why it’s so short is because we want to keep it simple.

Treebeard: but it being of great importance, I not understand of why.

Russ: well if it was a big long word, it would be complicated, like reality is.

Laura: comes from real.

Russ: yeah whereas if we just say it’s real, therefore we’re simplifying and the whole entire experience that we're discussing and not taking into account the vast possible number of aspects and changes that surround us. We ignore that and just focus on what is simple and easily perceived.

Treebeard: so hasty, it is being hard of comprehension for myself.

Skip: well not only that but by using a simple, short word, everybody understands it.

Laura: yeah.

Russ: yeah.

Treebeard: hmmm, but it being of so great importance, for people of great importance for example being of his holiness the………I’m trying to pick on thoughts for the Pope. How would you describe his full title? He is his holiness......

Russ: Pope Paul the....

Laura: John Paul.

Treebeard: the Vicar of Christ Church on earth, Pope John Paul II. Someone of such great importance having such great, grandiose name I understand but something even more of being importance yes, so small.

Skip: okay Treebeard, okay……the only way that it makes sense to me, and this is my personal concept of it, is by using the small word even with the great importance of it, even uneducated people of our world understand the word real, okay?

Treebeard: hmmm.

Skip: whether they can read, write or not, they understand that word.

Laura: and it’s not really the word that's meant, it’s the meaning of the word.

Treebeard: hmmm.

Skip: yeah but they understand. When you say something is real, they understand it.

Laura: yeah but Treebeard’s saying such an important word's so small, it’s really not the word that matters or how many letters it is, what matters is the meaning it carries.

Russ: well what about truth?

Skip: truth is a small word.

Russ: yeah it means vast amounts.

Treebeard: uh-huh, see….

Laura: but it’s a really…..what matters how it’s spelled and whatever how you say it, it’s the meaning in the word.

Skip: yeah but what I was trying to get at is the meaning of it, even for the uneducated, they understand this okay? By being such a small word, even with the magnificent applications of it.

Russ: yeah if we were to call real, the perception of the events that encompass our environment that we call our world is the word we use for real, we’d be forever trying to discuss it.

Laura: and the meaning would still be the same.

Russ: right.

Treebeard: hmmm, I will have to being of dwelling on this later but after I have being finished on matter we being of discussing last week.

Russ: uh-huh, okay good.

Treebeard: it is lesson for me being to understand but understanding important. So much to being for understanding but time being so little, it is hard and difficult for the growth necessary to learn what is necessary. It is like being of Omal saying that if you were to take timelines and combine them all being together, analogy you understand is you are the center wire in a huge cable?

Russ: uh-huh.

Treebeard: but huge cable so big it is being un-perceivable on size, it being of infinite size.

Russ: hmmm, we can’t grasp the immensity of our environment through the perception that we call reality because we’re living it.

Treebeard: best way of saying is you cannot see the woods for the tree…trees.

Laura: yeah, uh-huh.

Russ; good point, good point.

Skip: yeah, that's it exactly, good example.

Treebeard: question? Being of stealth aircraft in crashing to forest, would anyone being of hearing it if no one there?

Skip: in other words, would make a noise if nobody was there to hear it.

Treebeard: correct.

Skip: it’s the same……

Russ: it was an attempt at humor, that was very good Treebeard.

Skip: yes it is, it is a very good example. It’s the same with having a landslide......

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Skip: would anybody hear it if nobody was there.....would it make a noise if nobody was there?

Russ: yeah.

Skip: not to our ears.

Laura: it still would make a noise, it's just that we wouldn't hear it.

Skip: how do you know it would make a noise if you wasn’t there to hear it?

Laura: because it’s logical.

Skip: no, it isn't logical.

Laura: for me it is.

Skip: okay alright, I'll go along with that, I'll go along with that. But you’re right Treebeard......

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Skip: that has been an example for many, many years.

Treebeard: it is a perception on what reality is. If you being of perceiving what is, then it is so but not being perceiving of what it is, then it isn’t.

Russ: now Treebeard, here’s a question for you I’ve always had trouble with.

Treebeard: uh-huh.

Russ: our déjà vu, or what we call déjà vu, always occurs from a dream state that we then relive in a physical awareness or perception. Now because of that, is the dream state that we are experiencing that we will live later on, an actual traveling through some of the various timelines and visiting aspects of ourselves and various other environments that we relive at maybe perhaps some other time because all things are possible?

Treebeard: being you of open and easy to being of probing, I would answer clearly what you are saying by not saying. Best way of saying is that mental waves from other aspects of yourself being close, even in the same proximity but in parallel universes being transmitting the information you are receiving.

Russ: oh so we’re not going there, they’re merely thinking and we’re picking up the thoughts.

Treebeard: being of correct. Normally when feeling of same same visit before happen, it is of place that is striking you as beautiful and strong emotional output is being exerted. You are being picking up of that event. So when you have feeling of strong emotional output, a real of you in another parallel timeline is picking up feeling of déjà vu later on.

Russ: wait a minute, I think I grasped that but I’m not quite sure.

Skip: go ahead.

Russ: so when I…..I can’t be right because if I had a dream let’s say five years ago and suddenly I come in to a situation where that dream is relived in every exact, same detail.......

Laura: wow.

Russ: well just a portion of the dream.

Laura: uh-huh.

Russ: maybe all of 30 seconds, how is the thoughts of someone on another aspect influence that dream state of five years ago?

Treebeard: because being of all possible outcomes having happened, those outcomes also similar ones occur in your present timeline. So actions in another timeline of being earlier, something happening or supposedly being happening earlier, that did not happen in your timeline that has to happen in another timeline occurs so therefore transmittal happens because of great emotional stress and then is picked up in the dream state when it is meant to happen in your timeline. All timelines not happening in same sequence.

Russ: yeah but five years apart?

Skip: time has no matter.

Laura: no, yeah.

Russ: that’s true.

Treebeard: uh-huh, being of example, take Susie (from Sedona).

Russ: yeah.

Treebeard: okay being of nine years now?

Russ: uh-huh or longer, ten.

Treebeard: okay, being of moving.

Russ: right.

Treebeard: okay, supposing you and being of Susie together and Susie being supposedly in timeline that you two still together has child five years ago.

Russ: okay.

Treebeard: then the great emotional joy would create a connection with a near timeline of you where it would be dream't and then another person replacing that in the future will take place.

Russ: so we create the déjà vu?

Treebeard: correct but in different timeline.

Russ: so we make it fit to our particular environment and it’s really just an emotional feeling that we paint and fill in the blanks.

Treebeard: being of correct.

Russ: being of weird.

Treebeard: hmm, weird.

(everyone chuckles)

Treebeard: definition of weird?

Skip: unusual.

Laura: strange.
 
Russ: hard to comprehend.

Laura: strange, illogical in ways.

Skip: many definitions Treebeard.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: all inaccurate for word. Having being of discussion with Mark and I ask what is weird, he give correct answer. Anyone being of knowing where word come from?

Russ: weird, isn't it from the Celtic ability of using…no?

Treebeard: inaccurate information. It being of Saxon.

Russ: ohh Saxon.

Treebeard: weird meaning good, positive.

Skip: different.

Treebeard: I being of trying to recall what Mark give explanation for. I be of different thought processes when he mentioned. I be dwelling on question that I would’ve been answering tonight however too many arrived so I being therefore of brushing aside and not paying attention as should. Wishing of I had.

Russ: hmm, no problem but you’ve answered some very important questions.

Skip: uh-huh.

Laura: oh yeah, oh yeah.

Skip: yeah definitely.

Russ: it’ll take me a while to grasp but I can’t wait to get it on the webpage.

Laura: (unintelligible)

Treebeard: I being of honored to be able to in some small way aid in learning. It is my honor.

Russ: no small way though, that’s for sure, it's a biggie.

Laura: yeah.

Treebeard: I am being of greatly honored. It is small way that I may be able to shed light in best way possible for all.

Russ: I’ve asked this question to many people including Omal but no nobody’s given that answer in that way that made me understand it that well.

Skip: yeah.

Treebeard: well being of gift that I be of having, it is easier for me to pick what is being said when not being said.

Russ: wow.

Treebeard: okay I be one more?

Russ: I’m…

Treebeard: question of asking.

Russ: I’m good myself, I’ve got to dwell on this for a while.

Skip: no.

Laura: I think I’m done as well.

Russ: thank you Treebeard.

Laura: yes, thank you Treebeard.

Skip: thank you Treebeard.

Treebeard: you are being of welcome. May your lives be filled with light and it has been an honor and a pleasure. Laura.

Laura: thank you.